The proposed development comprises a new livestock building at the working farm. The original application was refused primarily because of concerns over its effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding landscape, with the site lying within an Area of Higher Landscape Value.
Following a site visit, the Planning Inspector concluded that while the development would introduce a new building into the countryside, its impact would be limited by its close relationship with the farm's existing agricultural buildings.
The Inspector noted that agricultural buildings are an expected feature of rural landscapes and concluded that the resulting harm to the character, beauty and tranquillity of the countryside would not be unacceptable.
The importance of supporting a working farm
A key part of the appeal centred on the operational needs of the agricultural business.
Pilmore Farm is understood to be the
last operational farm remaining in Old Cassop, and the Inspector gave significant weight to the benefits associated with supporting the business.
These included the economic contribution of the farm, improvements to animal welfare through the provision of sheltered and dry accommodation, and better management of manure and surface water.
The scheme will also deliver
31.69% Biodiversity Net Gain, using land close to the appeal site and within the applicant's ownership.
Balancing landscape impact with the benefits of development
The Inspector acknowledged that the development would have some impact on the Area of Higher Landscape Value, but concluded that the benefits of the proposal clearly outweighed that harm.
As a result, the appeal was allowed and planning permission granted, subject to conditions.
Steve Barker said:
“This was a good example of why it is important to look at a planning proposal in the round rather than considering one issue in isolation. There was an acknowledged landscape impact, but there were also clear operational, economic, animal welfare and biodiversity benefits associated with allowing a working agricultural business to develop.
“We’re delighted that the Inspector recognised that balance and that our client can now move forward with the project.”
The success also has an added connection within the wider P&K Group, with the client also working with
S&A Fabrications.
For Prism, the appeal demonstrates the importance of clear planning arguments and a strong understanding of how different considerations should be balanced when an application has initially been refused.
If you have had a planning application refused, or need advice on whether an appeal is the right next step, talk to the Prism Planning team.
